Obtaining Immunization Record In Ontario

Road Interview with Andrea on the results

"As president of the jury, tell us the reasons they had to give the great award.

-Farfán Claudia's work for what happens on remembered "Piñeragate" is a great story that somehow close a chapter in Chilean political history. Much has been written on this subject, but now, after years, a journalist as it takes Claudia Farfan, reinvestigate and reveals many previously unknown facts.

I noticed that the report had no more impact on the political and journalistic world. Really, I deserved. In Chile we used to be quite hysterical with some news, especially news hits, and then stay there and never resolved. Somehow this story is going in the reverse flow. Takes up the issue and solve it. And it is written so that if you read this in twenty years, as you'll understand what happened.

- Why not record the vote of the jury and made public?
"Well, the jury is free to say what one thinks, and if you read those opinions outside the context in which they occurred, can be misinterpreted. For example, often occurs in the discussion of a jury is very clear in advance who will win, but upon hearing the arguments of others, are rethinking that view. To me it seems very interesting and healthy. We have set a standard that is to the winners was unanimous and it's always in the phrase "keep talking to convince us."

- why there was only one report of Transantiago, if it was one of the major themes of the year?
- is interesting what happened there. I think Transantiago stories were much better resolved in television than in newspapers. Headlines like the Transantiago, as the death of Pinochet, which are so powerful on TV I do not know what happens, they are half hidden in the print media. Just as there are few studies on Transantiago, there is little about the death of Pinochet, and last year there was little the "Penguin Revolution ." Perhaps excellent material needs a certain distance to be told. Maybe these issues are far above and also very strong television competes with newspapers.

- Let the winners by category. In the category "Strike journalist who won the series of The Mercury on corruption in the Coalition: interviews and Jorge Edgardo Boeninger Shaulsohn.
"Those interviews Mauricio Carvallo (actually correspond to a trilogy which is completed by another Gonzalo Martner) were a clear journalistic coup. After its publication, especially Schaulsohn of , which entitled as "Ideology of corruption" that had been expressed before Boeninger, "there was a change in the media agenda. Somehow the public felt for the first time in almost unanimous, actually during the governments of the meeting was followed by acts of corruption beyond what had hitherto understood. So MOP-GATE case had two looks. One from the Alliance and one from the Coalition. think that from these interviews and there was no justification, no defense. Reading and its impact on public opinion that will shape the future Chile's political.

-In the "opinion" there was a football column, of Philip Bianchi in El Mercurio on police issues of the U-23 in Canada.

-The column " Sorry, but ..." I found master. Masterfully written, first. It is true that before there was a column published in The Nation Sunday playing the theme, but it seems to me that the column touched Felipe better. It was against everything that was happening at that moment, how they played against the issue, against a kind of chauvinistic hysteria in which unfortunately was very involved the press. was a time when journalism was wrong and instead of empathizing or tune with the audience, believed to be part of it. Felipe Bianchi takes the issue, dares to say what he says and go to all this. In my view, turn the tide and put it at the point where it should be. Is a column that not only addresses the subject of football, but it shows this environment we are falling Farandulera journalists.

"A work of The Clinic, The Javiera crime " Carla Celis and Juan Andrés Guzmán, won the category" Feature. "

- "The Crime of Javiera" is a masterpiece of editing and dramatic structure on a terrible tragedy: that of a little girl who is thrown out the window of a building by his father. It is, in essence, the reconstruction of a murder through statements made by those involved and witnesses at trial. What is interesting is the dramatic structure. From the title we know the end, someone will die. However, we do not know how Javiera going to die, and that's not revealed until the final. The other thing that is very interesting is the issue: the transition between what a witness says and what other states is very fluid.

- Finally, in the "interview or profile, won Recabarren Marcela, Paula magazine, with" Narcotest ": a profile of a prosecutor threatened by drug traffickers.
"This job has Recabarren Marcela Pen. She is a journalist who has spent several years writing on Paula magazine and has been a finalist before the award by and what is obvious to me is lack of pretension that is his pen. And I think that today in Chile, by God it costs them to journalists, even the good: to be able to tell in a clear, direct, adjective corresponding, with dramatic structure ... For me " Narcotest" is a classic piece of good journalism. Maybe not a masterpiece, but for me it's a classic. And as in fashion, classic is always welcome.